December 23rd, 2009
On Immigration
Anytime
someone argues against making immigration to our country or attaining
citizenship easier, their underlying arguments seem to me very close to
racism.
The arguments I've heard tend to be along the lines of,
"They'll take our money," or, "They'll take our jobs." But who is
"our"? America's always been a nation of immigrants.
It took
me a long time to get over my fear of immigrants. It took a lot of
reflection to realize that what used to make me so against increased
immigration was the fear that my comfortably white and English-speaking
culture might start to change.
Now I can appreciate diversity, and realize that just because your world is changing doesn't mean you're threatened.
The
other big argument against facilitating more immigration is that
immigrants tend to be poor, and seem to show a greater tendency toward
crime and sucking up government resources.
Therefore, I
encourage a push for citizenship, and, as usual, education. I believe
they're poor and alienated because they haven't been educated in the
same schools as wealthy America.
It's not a question of "us vs. them."
I'm not big on required education, but I would like to encourage American schools to teach Spanish to their students.
December 9th, 2009
"The
greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the
rules but by people following the rules. It's people who follow orders
that drop bombs and massacre villages.
"As
a precaution to ever committing major acts of evil it is our solemn
duty never to do what we're told, this is the only way we can be sure."
Banksy. Wall and Piece, 2005.
December 7th, 2009
"I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world. We respect your faith. It's practiced freely by many millions of Americans and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah.
"The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself.
"The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends. It is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists and every government that supports them."
George W. Bush, September 20th, 2001
Just a reminder.
December 6th, 2009
Two Big Ideas About Money
Big Idea #1
What if
currency was made out of food? We've heard about the gold standard and
the silver standard, but those things are only valuable because they
say we are.
I vote we use the food standard. More specifically, I'm envisioning something like apples. Maybe kumquats. 
The new national currency on the left, the old on the right. Source: BabyCenter.com
Three arguments:
-We'll never have to worry about stagnant markets again, because your money will rot if you don't spend it quickly enough.
-There will be less of a tendency to hoard money because, again, your money will rot if you don't spend it quickly enough.
-It'll no longer be necessary to cut trees to print money because money really will grow on trees.
Big Idea #2
What if there was a bank that had no fees?
On
a more serious note than kumquats, during my time with the Americorps
organization City Year, I met a wonderful janitor at the Timberland
headquarters. Every time I asked her how she was, she would respond, "I
am happy. And you?"
Yet my old boss once told our corps of how
every time she received a paycheck, the janitor had to spend $3 to have
it cashed -- which can amount to a lot when you don't have a lot.
We
hear every day of people having to take new loans to pay off the
interest on old loans, maxing out credit cards, or simply not being
able to get an account.
So again, what if there was a bank that
had no fees? It didn't charge to cash a check or use an ATM, or issue
anything but debit cards so you couldn't overdraw your account. It
wouldn't give you any interest on your account, nor would it expect any
interest on your mortgage or a loan, and would specialize in micro
loans. It wouldn't sell debt, nor invest your money in other companies.
It would be called the National Mattress, since under it the entire nation could comfortably hide their money.
November 29, 2009
Presidential Thought for the Day: On Bottled Water
Bottled water is, in most cases, just plain silly.
(If you really need me to tell you why, just ask.)
November 27, 2009
Video Update: On White Guilt
Harnessing
technology, woo-hoo! A reader suggested a while ago putting video
updates on YouTube. So I've done it. It feels uncomfortable and looks
pretty low-quality, but with any luck, watching me talk through my
thoughts will be more interesting for you (collectively) than reading
through them.
All my videos will now be available at:
www.YouTube.com/RT2024
The
two currently available videos are on white guilt. Take a quick online
test by Harvard that may measure how racist you are, discuss the test,
and hear me unleash my theory on why we still have a racist and
segregated society.
November 25, 2009
If you believe in what I'm writing on this website, I need you to get other people to listen.
If
the things I'm writing are true -- about money, and art, and war --
then the entire world needs you to get other people to listen. To
listen to what I have to say, and what you have to say, and the ways we
agree and disagree, and your own completely separate ideas and
philosophies.
I don't want this to be a campaign. I want this to be a movement.
Consider
that in the Congo, right now, there's a girl dying of starvation. When
I speak of the difference between being a part of a campaign and being
part of a movement, I am speaking of the difference between donating
money to a non-profit organization that specializes in preventing
Congolese genocide, or running for President so that in 15 years you
can generate substantial awareness of the conflict in the Congo and
encourage Congress to allocate funds to pursue peace -- the difference
between those, and buying the next plane ticket to Central Africa,
putting yourself on a 24/7 live Internet video feed, and refusing to
touch food in front of the world until humanity realizes that without
having been told to do so, an American is willing to die for the
well-being of a famished, foreign girl.
Would I do that?
Absolutely, if I wasn't so scared. I hope you have more bravery than I
do, because becoming truly content and fulfilled in your life takes
much more strength and courage than becoming what should
make you truly content and fulfilled (namely, a job, 1.6 children, a
house, a decent salary, etc. -- how many people have you met who have
all these things and don't have any personal problems? Be very cautious
around material comfort.).
Again, I don't want this to be a
campaign. I want this to be a movement. I want other to be inspired to
do something themselves about what makes their lives anything less than
content, rather than follow American politics as usual, in which we
elect a President we hope will solve all our problems for us.
When was the last time anyone solved all your problems for you?
Happy Thanksgiving, on that cheery note.
Check out this man:
A Life Without Money
November 15, 2009
Just send an e-mail with your mailing address to robin@RT2024.com to receive a free sticker and wristband. No future mailings, and no money involved.
Do me a favor: post a picture of yourself with your wristband and/or bumper sticker to the Facebook group!
November 1, 2009
On Running for President

The funny thing about being President is that if you do your job well enough, you're out of a job.
That's true of the military too: if it does its job well enough, then there won't be any more wars, and no more need for a military. In fact, I suppose that's true of any job; if everyone is working to make the world better in some way, if the world ever becomes perfect, then you don't need to work.
I imagine that's one source of corruption in politics. No politician wants to work out all the bugs, because then they won't get a salary.
The only people who would still be working in a perfect world would be the artists. Carpenters, lawyers, and grocery-baggers all manipulate the world to make it "better," but artists instead try to manipulate the way people see the world.
Every "real job" in our economy considers "success" to come from changes in the physical and material world. Artists, on the other hand, consider "success" to come from making a difference in how people see the world. The former move mountains in order to become happy; the latter move themselves. The former measure happiness in changes in money, something you can hold; the latter measure happiness in, well, happiness.
Being an artist doesn't mean you have to be a painter or a writer or a musician. It does mean you have to do what lets you be yourself. For some people, that might be making furniture; for others, working on an assembly line; for others, doing accounting. Who knows?
Running for President is one of my arts. I'm not doing it to become President; I'm doing it to change the way other people think about the world, which makes me feel fulfilled. I'll have done my job well when the nation is full of young people who also want to be President.
September 19, 2009
On Health Care
Americans'
"pain tolerance" is extremely low, remarked political commentator
George Will during a 2007 address at Miami University. Mine certainly
has been. I opposed legislation allowing conceal-and-carry gun permits,
but the result of the legislation being passed hasn't been a dramatic
surge in crime, the way I imagined. I was skeptical of the recent
smoking ban in Ohio buildings, but the result of the legislation being
passed wasn't a wave of restaurants and bars going bankrupt. Political
decisions tend to be like SARS and the avian flu: whenever they're
supposed to ruin the nation, they usually don't.
So whatever happens with this health care snafu, I have faith in Americans' human ability to adapt to the new situation. Whether we adopt "Obamacare" or otherwise, we will all quite likely do just peachy.
Rather than spend years debating the "right" sort of health care plan to implement, I encourage the government to just choose one of the different health care plans, jump into it whole-heartedly, and see what happens. So much time is wasted on the politics of compromise, as legislators wage wars of attrition on each other to make bills suit everyone's interests. To quote My Fair Lady, when the House and Senate are presented with two different approaches to a challenge, "rather than do either they do something else that neither likes at all."
Instead
of sending a little money here and a little legal support there to try
and please everyone a little bit, let's send all our support one
direction and see what happens. Committing 1% to a 100 different ideas
is a terrible way to see what works. Let's try committing a full 100%
to one idea.
Our
reliance on health care may be a symptom of a greater problem. More
than health care reform, I encourage increased government education,
recreation and nutrition programs to get kids outdoors, make adults and
parents aware of proper ways to eat, and to decrease our obsession with
screens. I encourage increased taxes on junk food and decreased taxes
on raw foods. I encourage shifting paradigms, changing the way we think
and live so that, some day, perhaps we won't need health care in the
first place.
"Not very far away were the Triple Demons of Compromise -- one tall and thin, one short and fat, and the third exactly like the other two. As always, they moved in ominous circles, for if one said "here," the other said "there," and the third agreed perfectly with both of them. And, since they always settled their differences by doing what none of them really wanted, they rarely got anywhere at all -- and neither did anyone they met."
-The Phantom Tollbooth (1961, New York: Bantam)
August 25, 2009
On Money
Terry Prachett, the author of the Discworld
books, likes to say that God(s) only exist because we believe in them.
The same is often said about time. But while the nation has its
atheists, there are very, very few Americans who don't believe in money.
Your
little green piece of paper is just that — a little green piece of
paper. It only has value because we've given it value. It doesn't
represent anything but faith, or trust. Every greenback's "In God we
trust" seems like a nod to Mr. Prachett's view of religion with an
ironic connection to the world's view of cash.
Physics has the
Law of Conservation of Energy. You and I and the rest of the world are
much the same with money: the total amount of cash value in
civilization never grows or shrinks. The U.S. might print more money,
but its value will decrease proportionally through inflation, and vice
versa. We get things like food and houses and TVs just by moving these
little units of faith and value from person to person, just as a
chemist might move chemicals from test tube to test tube without ever
changing the total amount of chemicals. With money, one person always
has to lose something in order for someone else to gain something.
The
current recession was due to people relying on money that didn't exist.
But what's strange is that no money really exists. People build
empires, reputations, and their place in the social hierarchy solely on
something that doesn't exist. People wear certain brands of clothing or
drive certain kinds of cars just to strut their reliance in something
that doesn't exist. And yet, we're all pretty much identically naked
underneath our clothes!
A Stanford student demonstrates a fascination with money. Photo: Robin Thomas
So what do I want you to do about it?
I haven't come up with an alternative to the way we run society today.
But I do want to encourage you to avoid having "making money" as one of
your goals. Don't view money as an end. Instead, think about what you
need that money for. If you want to buy a car, instead of thinking, "If
only I could earn more money", try thinking, "If only I could earn a
car". If you want to do something nice for someone you love, instead of
thinking, "If only I had more money", try thinking, "If only I had some
way of showing them I love them". If you need more food, instead of
thinking, "I can't eat because I don't have money", try thinking, "I
can't eat because I don't have food". Sounds silly, right? Money is
only a means to those ends, and is just one of many means, which we
forget very, very often. Maybe you'll be surprised by what alternatives
to "spending money" you come up with in order to get what you need
(sharing with others, growing your own food, building your own things).
But hey, maybe not!
I keep dreaming of giving away everything I
own except the clothes on my back, and entering the world fresh and
unbound to any system. I think a lot of people have had that dream. But
I've always been too scared to make it a reality. If that ever changes,
I'll let you know how it goes.
I look forward to people challenging my views because it makes me think. Send me a critical e-mail, at robin@RT2024.com, and I'll post it in the 'Think!' section, along with my response.
August 8, 2009
On War
I'm
sitting in the San Diego airport next to a dozen or so Marines, who are
sleeping in tiny cots outside of the United Services Organizations
building. I wonder if they're going to or coming from combat. And
here's a little Midshipman, coming from a month of infuriatingly cushy
training. Whenever a civilian sees me in uniform and "thanks me for my
service", this intense feeling of unworthiness bubbles up in my throat.
I feel humbled sitting here, and find myself wishing I was part of the
"once a Marine, always a Marine" community, taking the test of physical
and mental strength all Marines endure, earning the right to sleep on
my own little cot next to these men. I'm wanting to prove myself.
So
where does that deep respect for the warrior come from? Why is it even
a Midshipman will get thanked on the street for his or her service, but
not a person in City Year or Peace Corps gear?
Probably because
ingrained in the human mind is the idea that the warrior is willing to
lay down his or her life for a cause, and there's little more honorable
than that. But hopefully soon the human mind will come to realize that
there are many Americorps workers or Red Cross workers who are equally
willing to die so that others may enjoy life.
Hampton Academy Junior High students painting a school mural with a City Year corps member. Photo: Robin Thomas.
The
Battle of Bunker Hill gave us "Don't fire until you see the whites of
their eyes". Today, humanity has become so much closer, thanks to tech
and travel, that you can't really help seeing the whites of anyone's
eyes. Sun Tzu in The Art of War instructs "know your enemy" and "keep
your friends close and your enemies closer", and today both are pretty
much impossible to avoid.
"Know your enemy" means acknowledging
that you have an enemy in the first place, and sounds like a CIA
mission statement. America's very good about knowing its enemies, and
Sun Tzu might be pleased by our approach to modern warfare. But the
ultimate goal of the military is to not need to exist, and the fact
that we haven't achieved world peace means we need to be doing
something different.
God, through Jesus Christ, gives us the
next step in Luke 6: "love your enemies". That doesn't mean stop
fighting. But that does mean start respecting. Stop knowing your
enemies and recognize their humanity, since all wars are caused by some
kind of disrespect or misunderstanding. Walt Whitman says "battles are
lost in the same spirit in which they are won"; interpret that as you
will.
Yesterday, Admiral John Harvey, head of the U.S. Navy
Fleet Forces Command, spoke at Naval Base San Diego. Afterward, I
fumbled my way through asking him (do I stand at attention or relax?)
whether, as evidenced by the massive typhoon relief efforts of the USNS
Mercy in Southeast Asia and the developing "hearts and minds" approach
of the Marines in the Middle East, as the world comes closer together
by virtue of technology and travel, the idea of military power is
changing from physical strength to humanitarian and educational
strength.
To make a shortish story shorter, he said yes. Hooyah.
Don't fight for anything
for which you aren't willing to die. Recognizing how
important the little things are is the key to leadership,
according to him, and the key to winning a people — having a clean bed,
food, water, relief from monotony, protection. Providing these things
for Marines is as much a physical necessity as it is a way of showing
respect for their work. Similarly, providing these things to the men
and women of Iraq or Afghanistan is providing them with enough respect
and enough sustenance that they don't have any more need for the
protection or cultural respect provided by al-Qaeda, for instance, or
the Taliban.
"Killing with kindness", when I've gotten over
myself and actually tried it, has had a remarkable success rate. I'd
like to see it tested on a national level toward an entire different
people.
Incidentally, the Marines don't yell and scream at each
other because they all had bad childhoods, as I used to think, but
because they develop confidence in each other and actually get stuff
done. To the USMC men and women, I pass along all the "thank yous for
your service" I've ever received, and add my own.
July 28, 2009
On How Americans Sit
Let's tackle "united we sit" before "united we stand".
Watch any audience take its seats, and you'll notice that everyone sits as far as possible from everyone else. The center seats might be taken first, sometimes the aisle seats, but in any audience of strangers, there is always at least one seat left open between every person, unless a packed house calls for some squeezing.
American trains are "overcrowded" when elbows start bumping, while European trains are considered "overcrowded" when people have to start sitting in each others' laps. In the States, taking a seat right next to another person on a mostly-empty subway car is as creepy and uncomfortable as standing right next to the only other person in an empty elevator.
It may be that we're afraid of needing to engage in conversation with the person next to us. Maybe we see them as some kind of physical threat. It could be we just like our leg room. But whatever the case, taking this checkerboard approach to seating usually means lots of physical discomfort for those seated anyway, as people clamber over them, knees and elbows flying, to get to the seats they left open. In a full house, everyone ends up right next to everyone else anyway.
Personal
bubbles can be a great thing, but I worry the reinforced steel personal
bubbles of our nation are a sign of inherent American distrust. I
encourage you (and me, too) to start believing that "united we sit":
plunk yourself down next to a stranger in the train, and introduce
yourself. Maximize space efficiency, be convenient for someone else,
and most importantly, bring the nation closer together.
July 9, 2009
Apparently, undercover U.S. government agents were able to smuggle bombs into ten federal buildings undetected:
But if you're about to go blaming someone, I'd like you to wait a minute. My mother introduced me to the concept of "blame-storming" recently. It's something of which we've all been guilty -- a plan goes wrong, and we spend great effort trying to pin down the person responsible.
I find that blaming a person isn't very satisfying, and even as a disciplinary measure, it doesn't get a whole lot accomplished. Instead, I'll choose to blame the way we think about security.
It can be effective to establish security routines, like luggage scanners and drug sniffers installed in airports and federal buildings. But we need to remember that routines are predictable, whereas those committed to hurting others strive to be unpredictable.
On
NPR yesterday evening, one of the executives of Google expressed the
company's commitment to always being "new". Even if you're good at
something, not changing it just because it works leaves you at risk to
becoming obsolete when someone else introduces something unique. Rather than shifting around security personnel, we'd get more accomplish by shifting around the way we think about security.
Please do your patriotic duty and think, and let me know what you're thinking at robin@RT2024.com. I'd love to post some disagreements with my own views.
July 4, 2009
Happy birthday to our national sovereignty, and a happy holiday to you!
A year of Navy ROTC might teach you more than you would expect. I'm still out to sea - so to speak - as to what a real military experience is like. But being only a month or two away from the day of choosing between being a sailor and being a civilian has forced me to really sit down and think about my commitment to our nation.
Robert Thomas, second from left, standing with other midshipmen at a UC-Berkeley N.R.O.T.C. function. Photo: Tori Gongwer.
Every
day, war becomes more obsolete. With the different cultures around the
world coming closer together all the time, it's becoming more and more
clear that, like it or not, we all really do have to live with each
other. Fighting about it is an old habit.
Gerald Jampolsky claims humans experience only two most basic emotions: love and fear. You can react two ways to our shrinking planet: you can fear your new neighbors, or you can love them. The "terrorists" with whom we're at war right now have chosen fear, making us their enemies. We've responded to them with fear ourselves. A community in which every citizen fears every other citizen isn't much of a community, and is extremely vulnerable. We are enlightened enough today to see that we're only the integrity of our international community by using violence to solve our problems, when the real enemy is a lack of education.
I recently read two amazing books, The Autobiography of Malcolm X as told to Alex Haley, and Three Cups of Tea by Greg Mortenson. I walked away thinking that, at the very least, humans of different identities can achieve peace simply by recognizing others' rights to be human. But really beautiful things happen when humans of different identities are compassionate toward each other while still viewing each other as no more or less "human".
I respect every respectable soldier for fighting for an ideal. And I would be hard-pressed to argue the United States shouldn't have entered the Revolutionary War and World War II, for instance. But I have some problems when I think about the toll war takes on individual sovereignty, especially on a day like Independence Day. Those earlier wars took place during a time when our world's different cultures were much farther apart, and international education wasn't truly feasible.
One of my more recent dreams is turning the Americorps and Peace Corps into a non-combative branch of our nation's military, seeking peace through education rather than through war with the same standards of discipline and commitment.
Mike Huckabee Finds Fellow Americorps Supporter in Runningmate
Call him premature, but former Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR) has found himself a runningmate. No, he isn’t a few months early… he’s years early!
On Saturday morning at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, Foster’s Daily Democrat photographer John Huff captured 2008 Presidential candidate Huckabee running (Far R) alongside ServeNext member and 2024 Presidential candidate Robin Thomas (Far L)...
Photo by John Huff
...Some quick numbers on the day:
- Thomas and Huckabee finished their 5k in under 30 minutes.
- 8 ServeNext members braved the cold and ran on Saturday morning.
- Huckabee has lost over 100 lbs. since he started running in 2003.
- As of 11/11/2007, 416 people have joined the Thomas for President Facebook group.
- If elected President, Huckabee will expand AmeriCorps by 100,000 members!
- Granite Idealism, November 12, 2007
Mike Gravel Speaks at Philips Exeter Academy, in Hampton, NH

Mike Gravel, a Democratic Presidential contender, spoke with students at Exeter Academy in January of 2008, shortly before the New Hampshire Primary Election. I had an opportunity to speak with Senator Gravel about national service:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFz9LEp-csc